SonyA7 III Vs Panasonic S1 КАКАЯ беззеркалка ЛУЧШЕ ДЛЯ ВИДЕО в 2020. НАСТРОЙКИ Sony a7iii's viewfinder magnification is 0.78x, whereas Sony a7ii has 0.71x. So, a7iii camera will provide you better details and focus of the object than the other one. This device is formed with fast hybrid AF with 693
If you are in the market looking for a full frame mirrorless camera, this Sony a7 ii vs a7iii detailed comparison will help you narrow down your search. Sony created a buzz when they announced the a7ii, and it was for the right reasons. The camera packed high performance with an affordable price tag. Editor's Choice Sony A7 III With double the ISO sensitivity, improved autofocus and 4k video, the A7III is worth the extra pennies. Check Current Price The a7ii saw widespread global adoption, from professionals and enthusiasts alike, and it turned out to be a very popular camera. However, with the third generation of the series, the a7iii, Sony has raised the bar much higher while maintaining a similar price bracket. The a7iii is the more advanced camera of the series, though, since its arrival, we are seeing discounts on the price of the a7ii, which means that it remains as an attractive alternative option. To weigh the changes and similarities, let’s start our comparison. You an also check out our guide to the Sony a7 II vs a7r II. Sony a7ii vs Sony a7iii Key Differences1. Size & Weight 2. Sensor Comparison3. ISO Levels and picture quality 4. Shutter modes and Continuous Shooting5. Autofocus6. Rear LCD & EVF 7. Video Recording8. Battery Power9. Value & Final Opinion Sony a7ii vs Sony a7iii Sony a7ii vs Sony a7iii Key Differences Sony’s best-selling a7ii was, and remains, an awesome camera that now retails for an especially reasonable price, so when the company introduced a newer edition to the Sony alpha 7 lineup the a7iii, it immediately had plenty of competition to overcome from its own previous version. That said, the a7iii obviously comes with additional features and specs that Sony has used to justify both its higher price and releasing it in the first place. The following are the key differences between the two models Sensor Both cameras come with nearly the same basic resolution at and MP respectively. However, the a7iii’s version includes new Exmor R CMOS technology with BSI for better light collection. ISO sensitivity range Sony doubles the out-of-the-box range of ISO sensitivity for the a7iii to 100-51200, vs. the a7ii’s 100-25600. There’s also more room for expansion on its ISO up to 204,800. Shutter modes and continuous shooting The a7iii doesn’t get as fast as Sony’s A9 but it does offer more continuous shooting speed than the a7ii. It expands on its predecessor’s 5fps to 10fps. Autofocus The Sony a7iii offers up a whopping 693 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points. The older model only comes with 117 phase-detection points and 25 contrast-detection points. Video recording changes The Sony a7iii can deliver 4K UHD video recording and full HD at a whopping 120fps, whereas the older camera only manages full HD 1080p video at 50fps. Battery power The new NP-FZ100 battery on the a7iii gives it excellent shooting duration by mirrorless camera standards. This model is rated for up to 710 shots at maximum resolution. The Sony a7ii was designed to handle only about 350 shots between charges. Touch screen and viewfinder details If you like the idea of touch controls on your camera’s LCD display, the newer model has you covered with touch on settings and focus point control. Oddly though, the a7ii’s display monitor comes with the better resolution, at just under million dots. Body design changes The Sony alpha 7iii is a slightly bulkier camera than the a7ii because of its taller and heavier body, but this added weight comes with more features. Pricing The newer of these two cameras is much more expensive, with a price that’s just over twice as high for the body only. 1. Size & Weight Sony’s a7iii comes with some more features and details and this means a heftier body. The difference is small enough not to be a major issue though. While both models come with similarly shaped and sized weather-sealed body designs for shooting during rain, dust, or snow, the newer Sony alpha 7 edition weighs a full 100 grams more and is just slightly taller than its predecessor. This is the main visible size difference between them. In terms of height and thickness, the a7ii and the a7iii are the same. The Sony alpha 7iii also comes with a slightly more pronounced back button/dial for ISO and display control on the back of its body, and its recording button has been moved to the left of the EVF, which is itself framed by an ever so slightly wider eye enclosure for better viewing comfort. WINNER We prefer compactness in a mirrorless body, but here the Sony a7iii wins simply because its bulk involves practical upgrades. 2. Sensor Comparison Both the a7 ii Sony camera and its a7iii successor come with full frame sensors just as the original Sony a7 did, but the key considerations are in the details. While both cameras offer the same 32 aspect ratio and basic megapixel resolution of and MP respectively the difference is irrelevant, the newer Sony a7 version offers the newer Exmor R CMOS sensor design, which includes a BSI backlight illumination system for notably better low light image quality. The newer a7iii sensor also comes with a front-end LSI chipset that increases readout and image processing speeds by over those of the a7ii. The newer camera’s newer BIONZ X sensor helps this same process, as does the a7iii’s superior ISO range. WINNER The Sony a7iii is without a doubt the winner here. Its superior sensor performance is notable during low light shooting and for fans of street or nature photography, among others, this is an extremely valuable difference. 3. ISO Levels and picture quality As we mentioned above, the Sony a7iii comes with superior low light performance due to its backlit full frame sensor, superior BIONZ X processor, and LSI chipset. What it also delivers, however, is a much higher ISO range of 100-51200, vs. the a7ii’s 100-25600. While in practical terms, there’s almost no chance of getting decent, noise-free photos at either of the upper extremes of these ranges, this expansion does increase functional ISO in the Sony a7 iii to a level that’s higher than that of the older a7 edition. A further improvement that the BIONZ X sensor adds to the Sony a7 iii is superior color reproduction and realism for both outdoor scenes and portrait shots of people. The difference in quality isn’t huge but we definitely noticed it, and it saves time on post-production photo editing if you use the a7iii. We also think the a7iii offers better high dynamic range. In terms of taking stable images, both the Sony a7ii and the Sony alpha 7iii come with the same 5-axis image stabilization technology for their E-Mount lenses. In this, they’re pretty much identical. WINNER The Sony a7 iii. It’s better with low light and at delivering functional ISO while also improving color quality and dynamic range. 4. Shutter modes and Continuous Shooting While both versions that we’re covering in this comparison of Sony’s a7 line of cameras are wonderfully fast at shooting photos, The a7iii is the total hands-down winner. It doubles the 5fps of the a7ii to 10fps with its new AF/AE tracking system and can even manage 8fps in live view mode. This translates to as many as 177 JPEG shots, 89 compressed RAW images, or 50 uncompressed RAW images at a time. The a7ii doesn’t even come close to matching this. The newer Sony a7 can manage only 50 JPEGS and 20 compressed RAW frames at a single burst. The Sony a7iii even offers an anti-flicker option that the a7ii lacks. With this little bonus feature, it detects the frequency of fluorescent or other artificial lights and times its own shutter speed to minimize exposure variations between frames. WINNER Sony’s a7iii is the absolute winner at shutter speed and continuous shooting. If you want to do action photography with sports or animals, go for the newer model. 5. Autofocus Just as it does with shutter speed and shooting, The Sony a7iii absolutely kicks the a7ii’s ass at autofocus performance. Sony totally upgraded this part of their a7 camera lineup with the a7iii and what you get is a whopping expansion to 693 phase-detection points along with 425 different contrast-detection points over 93% of its full frame sensor area. By contrast, the Sony a7ii can only manage 117 phase-detection points on the same size of full frame sensor and a comparatively modest 25 contrast-detection points. The newer of the two cameras even comes with Sony’s 4D Focus technology for tracking a moving object and predicting its movements for accurate focus selection at speed. It doesn’t always work but it’s impressive to mention. WINNER The Sony a7iii. It completely leaves the a7ii in the dust on autofocus. 6. Rear LCD & EVF As we mentioned above, the a7iii comes with a rear LCD screen that has the same physical dimensions as the a7ii’s display. Strangely though, the LCD screen on the sony alpha a7 iii has a somewhat lower resolution of only 988,000 dots vs. the million of the a7ii. It compensates for this with full touch controls of menu items and focus points. The EVF screens of both cameras are basically the same with an OLED display, the same million dot resolution, and the same placement. The one difference between them is a change in the optical design that lets the a7iii’s EVF offer better magnification at instead of the in its predecessor mirrorless camera. WINNER Sony’s a7iii is the winner here. Its LCD screen’s touch controls offer much smoother field usability. 7. Video Recording Sony’s a7ii mirrorless camera offers up decent but unexceptional video recording capability. It can deliver a maximum video resolution of 1080p at up to 50/60p at 50Mbps. This is good for most regular or documentary video recording but far from unique in any way. The Sony a7iii, on the other hand, ups the ante considerably for film-making It can handle 4K video and though it only delivers this at 24/25fps without sensor crop, what the camera does do is capture a full 6K worth of visual information before downgrading it to a stored 4K video format. This means increased sharpness. There’s also an option for 4K video at 30p but with a crop and only 5K of information reading. In either case, the a7iii is offering a whole level of recording that the older edition simply lacks. One final feature of the newer Sony a7 camera is that it can do high-speed 1080p video at a hefty 120fps with in-camera slow-motion saving options. Peripheral video recording features that both cameras share include Headphone output Internal 8-bit 420 recording 8-bit 422 signal output via HDMI WINNER The Sony a7iii is by far the better video recording camera of these two. If you’re interested in documentary shooting the newer model is the much better package. 8. Battery Power Simply put, the sony alpha a7 iii also offers the superior battery charge experience of these two cameras. Its newer NP-FZ100 battery technology outperforms the NP-FW50 of the a7ii by two-fold, giving you a total of 710 shots at a charge, or 610 with the EVF active since it drains quite a bit of power for its OLED display. These numbers may not seem like much if you’re used to the much larger shooting capacity of a DSLR, but by mirrorless camera standards, it’s very high. The a7ii, on the other hand, can only deliver about 350 shots per charge. WINNER The Sony a7iii takes the prize again for battery life. 9. Value & Final Opinion Sony a7ii vs Sony a7iii As our compilation of key comparison points above clearly demonstrates, the Sony a7iii beats the a7ii on just about everything. Both cameras are very good and share key essentials such as high-quality image stabilization and weather-proofing but the a7iii manages to deliver far more technical performance for all types of shooting while only slightly increasing its physical bulk, which is important in a mirrorless camera. However, here’s the interesting thing to keep in mind A great camera won’t really make a bad photographer better while a good photographer can pull off most of the same high-quality shots even on a merely decent camera, so long as they’re slightly more patient with how they work their magic. Thus, unless you need some very specific high-performance video recording capability or want to do precision action photography that would benefit from the a7iii’s much better focus point range and continuous shooting capabilities, the a7ii will deliver all of the essentials that you’d need for most kinds of professional or casual photography. We mention this because while the a7iii is indeed notably better than its predecessor on key performance enhancements, it also costs more than twice as much, and you might not need to pay that price if you know that the older model can deliver for your needs. Also, both cameras give you access to a wide range of Sony lenses – here are the lenses we recommended for the a7iii, which can also be used on the a7ii. WINNER The Sony a7iii is without a doubt the better of the two cameras, but its much higher price might not make it the right choice for every kind of need. Editor's Choice Sony A7 III With double the ISO sensitivity, improved autofocus and 4k video, the A7III is worth the extra pennies. Check Current PriceSonyAlpha a7 III Pemenang penghematan biaya + FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS + FE 28-70mm f/ OSS Pemenang perbandingan vs 132 fakta perbandingan Sony A7 II vs Sony Alpha a7 III Sony A7 II Sony Alpha a7 III Mengapa Sony A7 II lebih baik daripada Sony Alpha a7 III? Anti debu dan tahan air? 51g lebih ringan? 599g vs 650g The A7 was Sony’s first ever full frame mirrorless camera. It was released at the end of 2013 alongside the A7R. One year later, the Japanese company caught everybody by surprise with the launch of the A7 mark II, which arrived sooner than successor model was the world’s first full frame camera with in-body stabilisation. The design was also upgraded and more settings were you can find both models at an attractive price. They don’t have the last bells and whistles of the most recent E-mount products, but they remain an attractive proposition for those seeking a compact full frame camera on a the A7 and A7 II have in common full frame CMOS sensorISO 100-6400 50-25600 with extended rangeNo electronic shutter but there is the electronic-first curtain modeEVF with dots, magnification, 22mm eyepointSingle SD card slotEthics statement the following is based on our personal experience with the A7 and A7 II. We were not asked to write anything about these products, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Within the article, there are affiliate links. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Thank you!1. Image stabilisationThe A7 Mark II was the first full-frame camera and the first Sony camera to feature 5-axis stabilisation, a technology that was only seen in Olympus cameras at the time. It has an official rating of stops of compensation CIPA.The sensor floats inside a mechanism that compensates for shakes on five axes X, Y, Yaw, Pitch and Roll. It also works for you mount a lens with optical stabilisation, the camera will use three axes on the sensor Roll, X and Y and the remaining two axes Pitch and Yaw on the OSS remember being impressed by the IBIS mechanism on the A7 II when I first tried it out. Half a second hand-held with a wide angle zoom lens like the 16-35mm F4 is possible, but what surprised me the most were the samples I managed to capture with the 55mm prime lens using the same slow shutter II, f/ ISO 100 – FE 16-35mm f4 ZA – Hand-heldA7 II, f/ 4, ISO 200 – FE 55mm ZA – Hand-heldThese results sound excellent, but keep in mind that the hit rate is low around 10%, so don’t take just one shot. Check the result on the LCD screen, and try again. Don’t hesitate to make use of anything around you that can help you support the camera better and reduce the amount of shake, like a wall or a stabilisation is also useful when adapting lenses that lack electronic contacts, such as M-mount manual focus lenses for example. In this case, the A7 II will only use 3 axes Roll, X and Y. The performance is not as good as with electronic lenses, but you can still achieve more than decent results. Remember that you have to set the focal length manually in the II, 1/13s, f/ 2, ISO 200 – Summicron 35mm + adapter2. Uncompressed RAWThe A7 and A7 II use the same sensor, and they produce very good results when it comes to overall image quality and dynamic 1/50s, f/ ISO 100 – FE 55mm II, 1/100, f/ 11, ISO 125 – FE 16-35mm f4 ZAThat said, many users have complained about the lack of uncompressed and lossless compressed options for the RAW being advertised as 14-bit, RAW on the A7 is compressed which reduces the size of the file, but also eliminates data in the process. Personally, I never found this to be a deal breaker, but it is true that you can notice some lack in tonal range if you pixel peep certain images skin tones for example, or more noise if you recover a lot of exposure in listened, and release firmware for the A7 II that enables you to select uncompressed RAW. Unfortunately, this option never came to the original A7 Sensor flareOne annoying flaw on the original A7 is unwanted ghost flares that can appear around intense sources of light in an image, like in the example below. Apparently, these reflections are related to the AA filter on the sensor, although Sony never made an official comment about f/ ISO 100 – FE 28-70mm at 28mmWhen I started to use the A7 II, this is the first thing I tested and fortunately, I couldn’t replicate the same problem so it looks like Sony fixed can still encounter a bit of sensor flare on the A7 II, like in the example below, but the latter looks more like a normal sensor flare, where the light bouncing between the sensor and the glass elements inside the lens creates reflections of the micro lenses on the sensor. It also looks more II, 1/1000, f/ 8, ISO 100 – FE 16-35mm f4 ZAFaint traces of sensor flare in the top right area4. Video settingsBoth cameras can record Full HD up to 50p or said, the A7 II has a few advantages when it comes to settingsit can record with the XAVC S codec, which gives you a higher bitrate 50Mbps vs 28Mbps with AVCHD on the A7it can record internally with S-Log2, and other advanced video parameters to control the look of the image are available Picture Profilesit includes additional settings such as Zebra pattern, 31-step audio level and Time Code/user bit that video-makers will the overall quality, the two cameras are on the same level. Footage is decent, but you can easily end up with some moiré artefacts, and aliasing is noticeable. Rolling shutter is also present as soon as you pan with S-Log2 gives you extra details in the shadows and highlights, but the minimum ISO available is 1600, which is not helpful in situations where you have a lot of light, like outdoors in the sun ND filters in that case are a must.Neither camera has 10-bit recording, and the HDMI port gives you a clean feed but only at 8-bit 42 stabilisation works for video, and you can see from the following editing below how it performs. Overall I find it to be ok, but there can be a lot of jerkiness when panning, and I wouldn’t say the footage is perfectly stable for static shots either you’ll often notice micro jittering. But it certainly is better than that most of the shots were recorded with the Standard Creative Style, which is why there are fewer details in highlights clouds in the sky for example. The Creative Styles are designed for photos and have less dynamic range than the Picture Profiles, which are designed for video. At the end of the video, you can see an example with AutofocusThe two cameras share the same autofocus system with 117 phase and 25 contrast detection points. The number of settings is also the same, including Eye AF which works in S-AF phase detection points25 contrast detection pointsIn its press release, Sony claimed that the AF on the A7 II was improved by about 30% over its predecessor thanks to an updated algorithm, and that tracking Lock-On AF was more testing the camera, I concur that there is an improvement. I can’t really quantify, but it seems a bit faster when locking, more precise in keeping track of the subject and delivers a better hit rate. It’s not a night and day difference by any means, and we’re not at the level of A7 cameras that came after it, but the A7 II will definitely give you something extra when it comes to autofocus II, 1/3200, f/ ISO 100 – FE 55mm ZAThe mark II model also received a few more small tweaks via firmware DSLR lensesIf you’re interested in using DSLR lenses Sony A-mount, Canon EF-mount, the A7 II should be a priority, because it enables the use of phase detection AF with those lenses and a compatible adapter, giving you much better speed and focus accuracy than the detection can be enabled in the menu with the setting called AF System still image when a DSLR lens is used. Not that some settings such as Eye AF won’t be Sigma MC-11, one of the many Canon EF adapters available for Sony E-mount7. Continuous shootingBoth cameras have a maximum continuous shooting speed of 5fps but, at that frame rate, the A7 works in Speed priority mode, which means that image captured is prioritised over focus accuracy in other words, the camera might take the picture even if the subject is out of focus. If you want focus priority, the speed lowers to the A7 II, 5fps works with AF and AE tracking, which makes the mark II model a bit more efficient with fast moving II, 1/50s, f/ 9, ISO 50 – FE 55mm ZA8. Body designThe A7 II features a re-designed body. The width remains the same, but the mark II is deeper and heavier than its predecessor. The most noticeable addition is the larger front grip, which makes it more comfortable to hold and x x 474gA7 II x x mm, 599gThey are both weather sealed, but the A7 II has a more robust build with a full magnesium alloy frame and a more solid mount. The finish is also different the original model has a smooth black finish, whereas the A7 II is more opaque and dark/grey in shutter button has been moved on top of the grip, which I found more natural to reach and use. However, the front and rear dials are smaller on the A7 II, and I find them less precise and engaging than on the the A7 II has one extra custom LCD screen at the rear has no touch sensitivity on either model, but the A7 II version has more resolution vs dots.9. Real world battery lifeBoth cameras use the same NP-FW50 battery and they have a similar CIPA rating on paper 340 shots for the A7, 350 shots for the A7 II.However, my experience with the A7 II is more negative. I found the battery drained much more quickly than the A7, most certainly because of the in-body image stabilisation. That applies for stills and video. I emptied four batteries during a normal day of shooting. Buy lots of spares!Both have an optional battery grip, but be aware that the model is different VG-C1EM for the A7, VG-C2EM for the A7 PriceThe original Sony A7 is discontinued, so you can only find it second-hand. The average price is about $500, £400 or €400, although keep in mind that it can vary depending on the seller, the condition of the item and its A7 II can still be bought new at the time of publishing this article, and you can find it for $1000, £900 or €1000 body only.Used, the A7 II can be found for around $700, £600 or € prices as of early October have no doubt in recommending the A7 II over its predecessor. It has better ergonomics, 5-axis image stabilisation, more settings for video, a better autofocus and no sensor flare issues. Last but not least, you can find it for an attractive price today new or second-hand.If you’re on a strict budget, then the A7 is cheaper and it has the same sensor as the mark II model, which means that the image quality is the same as long as you can accept a few compromises as explained throughout the article.Check price of the Sony A7 oneBayCheck price of the Sony A7 II onAmazon Amazon UK B&H Photo eBaySecond-hand Sony gear onMPB US MPB UK Kelemahannyaterletak di kecepatan foto berturut-turut yang lumayan pelan (2.5 foto perdetik) dan harganya juga relatif tinggi, sedikit lebih tinggi dari Sony A7R. Selain itu, resolusi fotonya hanya 12 MP. Meskipun demikian, 12 MP cukup untuk mencetak sampai ukuran 50 cm. KESIMPULAN Mengapa Sony A7 II lebih baik daripada Sony Alpha 7?Sekat cuaca tahan percikan?Mempunyai kestabilan perubahan sensor?Memiliki fungsi timelapse?Mendukung smartphone remote?Mengapa Sony Alpha 7 lebih baik daripada Sony A7 II?125g lebih ringan?474gvs599gVolume bodi lebih kecil? hot shoe mutakhir? lebih tipis? EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMNikon D600 + AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm VRCanon EOS Rebel SL2 + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMFujifilm X-T30 + Fujifilm XF 18-55mm f/ R LM OISNikon D7100 + 18-105mm f/ ED VR DXCanon EOS 77D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS USMNikon Z50 + Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm f/ VRCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS M6 + Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/ IS STMUlasan penggunaPeringkat keseluruhanSony A7 II1 Ulasan penggunaSony A7 IISony Alpha 70 Ulasan penggunaSony Alpha 7FiturKinerja pada cahaya redupDesainviewfinderViewfinder elektronik EVFViewfinder elektronik EVFJenis viewfinder yang dimiliki dilindungi dengan segel ekstra untuk mencegah kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh debu, tetesan hujan, dan percikan layar yang lebih tinggi menghasilkan gambar yang lebih tajam, sehingga lebih mudah melihat EVF Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony A7 II Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony Alpha 7Jendela bidik elektronik EVF dengan resolusi yang lebih tinggi menghasilkan gambar yang lebih tajam, dan menghasilkan sebuah tampilan yang kualitasnya sebanding dengan tampilan pada jendela bidik fokus menggerakkan lensa untuk melakukan autofokus. Untuk kamera sistem, dengan memiliki motor fokus pada bodi kamera kamu bisa menggunakan berbagai macam lensa, termasuk lensa yang tidak punya motor fokus sendiri. Untuk kamera compact, motor fokus biasanya sudah lipat flip-out berguna untuk melakukan pengambilan gambarr yang cakupan 100%, kamu bisa menyusun gambar dengan tepat saat mengambil foto. Bila cakupannya kurang, kamu harus memotong foto setelahnya agar terlihat besar ukuran layar, semakin baik pengalaman satu aspek terpenting dari kamera adalah ukuran sensornya. Sensor yang lebih besar akan menangkap lebih banyak cahaya, sehingga meningkatkan kinerja cahaya rendah, rentang dinamis, dan kualitas gambar secara lensa Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony A7 IISemakin banyak titik fokus maka akan semakin leluasa dalam memilih bagian pemandangan yang akan difokuskan. Titik-titik fokus ini juga memberikan kemungkinan lebih tinggi kepada sensor gambar untuk mengidentifikasi bagian yang tepat untuk difokuskan dalam mode otomatis yang lebih megapiksel menentukan resolusi jepretan foto dengan kamera utama. Jumlah megapiksel yang lebih tinggi artinya kamera mampu menangkap lebih detail. Namun, jumlah megapiksel bukan satu-satunya elemen penting yang menentukan kualitas kepekaan cahaya level ISO yang lebih tinggi, sensor menyerap lebih banyak cahaya. Ini dapat digunakan untuk memotret objek bergerak menggunakan kecepatan rana cepat, atau untuk memotret gambar dalam cahaya redup menggunakan lampu ISO yang diperluas, kamu bisa melampaui ISO asli. Memperluas ISO dilakukan dengan meningkatkan output gambar secara digital. Gambar yang dihasilkan akan memiliki kualitas yang lebih rendah daripada saat berada dalam kisaran ISO asli, tetapi dapat berguna dalam situasi penggerak sensor, sensor gambar bukannya lensa bergerak untuk mengimbangi setiap getaran kamera. Ini artinya gambar akan distabilkan terlepas dari lensa apa yang cepat dan berlanjut berguna untuk menangkap adegan pelacakan AF, setelah kamu memilih subjek dan menekan shutter sepenuhnya ke bawah, saat subjek bergerak, fokus otomatis akan mengikutinya. Tidak ada lagi foto blur di luar maksimum yang tersedia untuk perekaman video dengan kamera utama. Meskipun memilih di antara tingkat bingkai yang lain dimungkinkan, perekaman tersebut biasanya memiliki resolusi yang lebih autofokus deteksi fasa jauh lebih cepat daripada sistem autofokus deteksi kontras. Bahkan saat merekam adegan dengan banyak gerakan cepat, video yang dihasilkan tajam dan merekam film hasil rekaman tetap fokus dan adanya port mikrofon, berarti bisa menambahkan sambungan mikrofon canggih atau mikrofon soket konektor mini standar, kamu bisa menggunakan perangkat dengan kebanyakan jenis stereo bisa merekam file audio atau film tanpa perlu mikrofon menunjukkan bagian yang lama dipercepat. Serangkaian foto-foto yang diambil dari posisi yang sama dalam jangka panjang digabung bersama-sama untuk membuat video pendek. Ini adalah cara yang bagus untuk menangkap hal-hal seperti matahari terbenam, atau awan bergerak di film Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony A7 II Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony Alpha 7Makin tinggi kecepatan bit pada perekaman film makin berkualitas filmnya dengan detil dan kenyamanan lebih serta makin kecil artefak mikrofon Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony A7 IILebih banyak mikrofon menghasilkan kualitas suara yang lebih baik dan membuat perangkat ini dapat menyaring suara kebisingan adalah sebuah standar pengukuran yang berdiri sendiri, yang menentukan berapa banyak jumlah gambar yang dapat diambil sebuah kamera sebelum baterainya bisa ditanggalkan dan diganti oleh pengguna jika rusakBaterai dapat diisi ulang daya dan digunakan indikator memperlihatkan ketika baterai baterai Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony A7 II Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Sony Alpha 7Kapasitas baterai menunjukkan jumlah energi listrik yang tersimpan dalam baterai. Kapasitas lebih besar bisa jadi menandakan daya tahan baterai yang lebih dapat tersambung ke adalah teknologi wireless untuk mentransfer data antara perangkat yang berbeda, seperti smartphone, tablet dan ini memiliki dua slot kartu memori, bisa menyimpan lebih banyak foto tanpa ganti kartu. Sangat berguna saat pengambilan gambar jarak jauh yang membutuhkan ruang penyimpanan lebih dapat mengambil serangkaian bidikan, menggeser sedikit sensor pada masing-masing bidikan, lalu dapat digabungkan untuk membuat gambar beresolusi sangat tinggi. Fitur ini sangat berguna untuk hal-hal seperti memotret karya gambar raw berisi data minimal yang diproses dari sensor gambar. File raw dinamai demikian karena file tersebut belum diproses sehingga belum siap dicetak atau diedit dengan editor grafis mampu mengambil gambar diam dalam format raw terkompresi lossless. Dengan demikian, bisa memiliki semua keuntungan dari pemotretan raw, namun mengambil lebih sedikit ruang penyimpanan. Ukuran file yang lebih kecil juga memungkinkan kecepatan read/write yang lebih Wi-Fi yang didukung oleh ini mungkinkan pengguna untuk menggunakan smartphone mereka sebagai alat pengendali jarak suatu dengan port HDMI atau HDMI mini dapat mengirimkan video dan audio ketajaman tinggi ke layarLain-lainResolusi menandakan jumlah maksimal piksel yang dapat ditampilkan pada layar, dinyatakan sebagai jumlah piksel pada sumbu horizontal dan jumlah pada sumbu piksel adalah ukuran resolusi layar, dinyatakan sebagai jumlah piksel per inci PPI pada layar. Kerapatan piksel lebih tinggi berarti gambar yang ditampilkan di layar nampak lebih tajam dan lebih D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Tunjukkan semua HjftjoE.